Speaking of browsers: the fact that a lot of things are web-based nowadays enables the switch too. Therefore, I looked around for alternatives. What I can't ignore, on the other hand, is the fact that some applications I used on Windows simply don't exist on Mac. I maintain that the average user can ignore that not all programs run natively yet. The list can be filtered by application area. Here you can find a comprehensive collection regarding the current status of the most popular applications: whether they're already ported, whether there is at least a beta version or nothing yet. I didn't notice a big difference in speed, and none at all in stability. Photoshop ran Rosetta 2 until mid-March, but the code is now available natively. Whether this is due to Rosetta 2 can only be said when the native version is out. Only Spotify seems sluggish when I start it up. Also, I didn't notice any bugs that could be attributed to Rosetta 2. The software looks the same, feels the same, and the performance is excellent. In everyday life, I don't even notice for which architecture an application was developed. I can only confirm what others have reported before: Rosetta 2 works excellently. This is partly done during execution to a large extent, however, the code is already adapted for the M1 chip during installation. The Rosetta 2 operating system translates software for Intel Macs into the ARM instruction set for Silicon architecture. Quick summary: in my everyday life, Mac iOS apps have played practically no role as of yet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |